Sunday, September 23, 2012
Friday, September 21, 2012
Design Writing: Robot Project (Idea: Movement...Sea Turtles)
Articles on sea turtles and their swimming capabilities/mechanism:
Sea Turtles
Sea Turtles and Speed
Swim speed and movement patterns of gravid leatherback sea turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) at St Croix, US Virgin Islands
Tuesday, September 18, 2012
ROBOT PROJECT PROPOSAL (DRAFT)
PROBLEM
The San Francisco Bay is home to an ecosystem of plants,
microorganisms, and animals. It is also a place of recreation and urban living.
Through the influx of human disturbances (personal and industry), the waters of
the San Francisco Bay have gone through extreme circumstances that are harming this
delicate ecosystem. One of the biggest concerns is chemical pollution.
According to Save The Bay’s website, “three million gallons of oil a year is
spilled into the San Francisco Bay”, which also includes “harmful metal
particles such as lead, zinc, and copper” (Save
The Bay). In addition, the advent of mercury in the waters has raised
concerns about its affects on fish and wildlife reproduction (Save The Bay) and concerns of sewage
disposal due to “sewage spills and crumbling sewage infrastructure (United States Environmental Protection
Agency).
PROPOSAL
With this information and understanding of the harms of
chemical pollution on The San Francisco Bay, I am proposing to create a robotic
monitoring and data collecting system that will swim into the depths of The San
Francisco Bay to record levels of the specific chemicals: lead, zinc, copper,
oil, and mercury. The robot will have its own propelling mechanism that will
allow it to “swim” effortlessly within the waters while picking up samples of
water to be brought back for examination. It will also be equipped with a
camera to take high-res photographs of The San Francisco Bay’s depth and
wildlife to tie in visually what chemical pollution has caused to the
ecosystem.
THE NEED TO BE ALONE TOGETHER...
One of the most profound points that Turkle makes in her
assessment of technology and our human experience is her observation (and
personal opinions) on how this relationship affects the most vulnerable,
children and the elderly. “We explain Kismet’s technical problems to Estelle,
but nonetheless, she makes every effort to get Kismet to speak. When her
efforts bear no fruit, Estelle withdraws, sullen…She tells us that the robot
does not like her. We explain this is not the case. She is unappeased” (Turkle,
pg. 96). I started to experience Estelle’s interaction and response to the human-like
Cog on a personal level because of the vulnerability of my own daughter. I
could see in Estelle what I see in my child and it brought this sense of
disappointment for what I have struggled with as a parent (reflective of what
Turkle mentions earlier in her book about people, according to children, as
“often disappointing”) and a new perspective on the vulnerability of my
daughter via her experience with technology. It brought to my attention how
much I don’t want technology interfering with my daughter’s vulnerability. I
see it as a fearful hindrance that, for children like Estelle and my daughter,
may do more harm than good. There seems to be no room to acknowledge this
vulnerability, which, as humans, involves our nature-made minds to necessarily
confront and work towards lessening this vulnerable state. In the case of
children, putting in the human work to relieve vulnerability will allow for
healing, which, in turn, encourages the joys of childhood and the healthy
growth to adulthood. For technology to take the place of this experience seems
to call for a quick fix that doesn’t last, but for as long as technology is
turned on (because god forbid that it turns off or malfunctions. We become
human again.).
From the observation of the elderly, I took another personal
view of seeing this vulnerability with my parents. Both of my parents are still
mobile and seem to be in between the stages of showing off their still youthful
agility (i.e. my close to sixty year old mother running around with her already
tired daughters and forever energetic granddaughter in a game of soccer) and
realizing that they are getting older (i.e. not going to bed without two gulps of
Tylenol for aches and pains). Yet, although they are not immobile or in a
nursing home and they are both active in terms of continuing their workaholic
ways, I did see that sense of loneliness Turkle mentions as an unfortunate
reality for many elders in this modern world. My parents are becoming a part of
that lonely population of older generations. My sisters and I are so much more
focused on our lives and strugglingwith the pace of society that we feel we
have no room to deal with our parents’ aging. As mentioned by Turkle, “grandparents…whose
care is often a source of family tension” (pg. 73), the thought of having (having, in the sense of, the cultural
implications, as Nigerians, to mandatory responsibility [or face tremendous
guilt and spiritual ramifications] of taking care of your parents) to take on
the responsibility of your parents in old age is quite daunting (and I say this
as a thirty-something mother with child whose growing up and I’m getting
older). Yet, as Turkle discusses the feelings children have towards their
grandparents and the idea of technology taking over their human care, I
couldn’t help but notice my own reserves of such a thing as an AIBO or My Real
Baby bringing comfort, companionship to people who brought me into this world
and took care of me without any robotic/AI assistance. This conflict also
brought to light how much my parents are using other forms of technology such
as the television to compensate for their loneliness. I know these ideas of
robotic elder care and/or tuning into some form of technology (i.e. television)
amidst the loneliness involves various human factors, which one them is the
lack of time children take and/or are allowed to care for their parents. It is
very bothersome, yet fascinating, of this supposed relationship (at least, to
the human), especially when observing it from an adult perspective whose grown
up unlike a child whose still developing.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)